Cybersecurity burnout

Cybersecurity burnout

United Kingdom, Jan 9, 2026

The sleeping giant awakening for UK businesses

Authored by Mike Fry, Infrastructure Data and Security Solutions Director, Logicalis UK&I

The cybersecurity landscape is evolving rapidly, demanding constant vigilance from already overstretched teams. As a result, as attacks rise in both scale and sophistication, many organisations are discovering a quieter yet equally dangerous threat from within: burnout.

Increasingly, this is no longer just an HR concern; it is a systemic issue fuelled by talent shortages, reactive firefighting strategies and alert fatigue. With 78% of organisations reporting a steady or rising number of attacks and 88% experiencing at least one security incident in the past year, the pressure on security teams is becoming unsustainable.

At the same time, system complexity is also compounding fatigue. When security professionals are forced to operate in permanent crisis mode, it increases the likelihood of human error and weakens resilience from within. Recent breaches at organisations including JLR, Marks & Spencers and the Co-op show how a single missed alert can trigger widespread disruption.

Furthermore, independent threat-landscape assessments, industry research and frontline intelligence highlight how traditional threats such as malware, phishing and unpatched vulnerabilities are now converging with newer enablers, including automation, AI-assisted attacks, supply-chain exploitation and cloud/identity-based compromises; all of which place even greater pressure on already stretched teams

To counter this, greater visibility across systems, supported by intelligent automation and smarter threat validation, can help reduce noise and ease the cognitive strain that fuels burnout. By shifting from reactive to proactive operations, businesses can equip their security teams to focus on strategy rather than day-to-day survival.

The hidden risk undermining resilience

Many organisations rely on the presence of cybersecurity tools as evidence of a strong security posture.
For example, a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) may be deployed, or monitoring may be switched on, which creates the impression that risks are under control. In reality, many of these tools are configured inadequately or produce volumes of data that internal teams cannot realistically manage.

Consequently, this breeds a false sense of confidence. When fatigue is present, it becomes even easier for issues to be overlooked and for weaknesses to grow unchecked across the environment.

Moreover, security professionals are often expected to remain proactive, analytical and vigilant while working through an unending flow of alerts and operational demands. The emotional strain created by this environment erodes morale and reduces capacity long before a breach occurs. Teams that are experiencing burnout are less likely to investigate anomalies or challenge assumptions, which means critical indicators can be missed for extended periods of time.

Alert fatigue and the escalation of human error

Alert fatigue is one of the most direct contributors to burnout. Today, modern enterprises commonly operate between forty and sixty security tools, each generating continuous notifications and events. Analysts must decide which alerts warrant immediate attention and which can be deprioritised. High-severity alerts may relate to systems of little operational relevance, while lower profile events may represent genuine emerging threats. Navigating this landscape every day drains cognitive bandwidth.

Additionally, the attack surface itself has expanded dramatically. Users, devices and data are now distributed globally and constantly in motion. Many organisations lack full visibility of where their data resides, who is accessing it and which systems are creating new risks. This borderless environment forces cybersecurity teams into a permanent state of reaction, and instead of strategic threat management, they are frequently firefighting urgent issues from multiple directions at once.

Compounding this, threat actors are advancing at pace. Artificial intelligence is now used to automate significant portions of the attack chain, allowing adversaries to scale operations without the constraints that defenders face. As automated and semi-autonomous attacks become more common, internal security teams find themselves outpaced at the very moment their capacity is diminishing through fatigue.

The role of visibility and intelligent automation

The complexity of today's cybersecurity landscape cannot be managed through human effort alone. Therefore, consolidation of tools and intelligent automation is becoming essential for restoring balance. Modern MXDR and AI-enabled XDR platforms reduce the burden on security analysts by automating high-volume, low-complexity tasks; specifically, alert triage, correlation of threat signals and the prioritisation of vulnerabilities can be executed at speed with greater accuracy than manual processes allow.

Furthermore, natural language capabilities simplify threat hunting and investigation, allowing analysts to work with far greater efficiency. These technologies reduce the cognitive strain placed on teams and enable junior analysts to perform tasks that previously required more advanced expertise. During live incidents, automated recommendations and guided response workflows help teams move quickly without the heightened stress that traditionally accompanies crisis events.

In parallel, platformisation plays a significant role in reducing burnout. Simplifying toolsets and centralising visibility gives analysts clearer insight and reduces the noise that can overwhelm even mature security functions. This shift enables internal teams to transition from constant reaction to more strategic, value-driven security work.

Building an environment that supports security teams

To begin with, addressing burnout requires as much leadership engagement as technical change. Organisations must understand their current cyber maturity using recognised frameworks such as CAF, CIS or NIST. These assessments provide a comprehensive view of risks and prevent reactive decision-making driven by fear or confusion.

In addition, a cyber-aware culture is essential, and it must begin with senior leadership. Cybersecurity should be represented at the highest levels of the organisation rather than positioned solely within IT. When senior leaders are accountable for cybersecurity outcomes, it reinforces the message that resilience is a business-wide priority.

Furthermore, tabletop exercises are one of the most effective ways to strengthen executive understanding. Simulating a breach helps leaders experience the operational and reputational impacts of an attack and highlights the pressure placed on internal teams during high-intensity events. This awareness encourages more thoughtful investment and better alignment between business objectives and cybersecurity outcomes.

Equally important, well-being and morale must be actively monitored. Engagement surveys, workload visibility, and regular dialogue with cybersecurity staff can identify early signs of fatigue. These insights should influence resourcing decisions, training priorities and the adoption of technologies that ease operational strain.

Practical steps business leaders can take now

To strengthen resilience and reduce burnout, organisations should conduct regular maturity assessments, reduce security tool sprawl and build a cyber-aware culture across the business. AI-enhanced MXDR or XDR can ease pressure by automating routine workloads, while closer monitoring of staff wellbeing helps identify early signs of fatigue. Leaders should run executive tabletop exercises to improve crisis readiness and ensure cybersecurity has representation at board level.

Cybersecurity burnout is an internal pressure that quietly weakens an organisation's defences long before an external attack takes hold. It operates like a sleeping giant within the business, largely unnoticed until its effects emerge in missed alerts, slower responses and reduced resilience. Once it stirs, the impact is immediate and far-reaching, striking at the core of an organisation's ability to respond when it matters most.

Addressing this hidden threat now is essential. If left unchecked, it will continue to grow in strength and influence, undermining even the most advanced security investments. Taking action today is the only way to stop the giant from fully awakening tomorrow.

 

Topic

Related Insights