The new perimeter

Identity is the new security perimeter

Jersey, Jun 29, 2026

Identity, not perimeter, is the new battleground for UK Cybersecurity

Authored by James Gillies, Technology Principal, Logicalis UK&I

Recent industry research shows identity based threats now rank among the most significant risks facing organisations, driven by sharp increases in credential theft, session hijacking and the exploitation of poorly governed identities. 

Nearly 90% of organisations experienced a cybersecurity incident in the past year, with more than four in ten suffering multiple breaches, underscoring how commonplace successful attacks have become even amid sustained increases in security spending. Attackers have shifted focus away from breaching hardened network defences towards exploiting logins, privileges, and identity systems to gain faster, quieter access to data and systems.

As hybrid work and cloud adoption become the norm, this identity-first threat landscape is intensifying. Traditional perimeter controls are routinely bypassed and security leaders increasingly recognise that identity has effectively become the new perimeter. This shift fundamentally changes how UK organisations must think about cyber resilience and how their security partners and service providers can support them.

The traditional security perimeter was built for a world where users worked inside offices, applications lived on-premise and firewalls formed a clear boundary between trusted and untrusted networks. That model no longer reflects reality. Many organisations across the UK have raced to adopt different cloud technologies to support hybrid and remote working needs, but often overlook security settings or fail to review configurations once the platform has been set up. This 'if it's not broken, why fix it’ approach has created a quiet security risk from within, as misconfigurations are leaving certain users with standing account privileges they shouldn't have or that should have been revoked long ago. The rush to adopt cloud technologies has also led organisations to neglect basic cybersecurity principles, such as using weak passwords, sharing login details, and failing to apply multi-factor authentication for all users. Each issue blurs the security perimeter further and creates quiet backdoors for attackers into enterprise networks. These gaps are exactly what attackers increasingly exploit to gain a foothold inside organisations.

Users, devices and workloads now operate everywhere, across homes, offices, cloud platforms and partner ecosystems. Recent research shows that nearly six in ten organisations say their security environments have become too complex to manage effectively and only around half are confident they can clearly identify where their security gaps exist. In this environment, the perimeter is no longer a physical or network boundary; it is the individual user and their identity. Access to data must therefore be based on who someone is, what they are trying to access, from where and under what conditions. This is why zero trust principles have become central to modern security strategies. Trust is no longer implicit once a user is 'inside' the network; it must be continuously verified and access should be limited to the minimum required to perform a task.

Many organisations still operate legacy access models that grant broad, standing privileges once credentials are accepted, creating an attractive opportunity for attackers. 2025 research shows that over 50% of organisations acknowledge they have invested in security controls they don't truly need, while two-thirds admit they are not fully using the capabilities they already have. If an identity can be compromised, the attacker effectively bypasses multiple layers of traditional defence in one step.

From an attacker's perspective, identity offers the fastest route to value. Rather than attempting to breach hardened infrastructure, they target the mechanisms that grant legitimate access. One study shows that well over half of modern breaches now involve compromised credentials rather than technical exploits, reflecting how effective identity abuse has become.Advances in automation and AI have made phishing campaigns more convincing, increasingly personalised and considerably harder for users to distinguish from legitimate communications.

Attackers no longer rely on poor spelling or obvious red flags. Instead, they abuse legitimate authentication flows, clone cloud identity portals and exploit password reset and MFA fatigue scenarios to obtain valid credentials. The rate in which AI is changing attacker behaviour means that relying on technical defences alone is not enough. Modern phishing attempts have evolved to  target the human layer and, with attackers constantly refining their methods to evade technical defences, no amount of investment into the best security tools will compensate unless zero trust strategies are embedded across the entire perimeter.

Beyond phishing, compromised credentials are widely available through underground marketplaces, often sold by initial access brokers (IAB) who specialise in harvesting and monetising identity data. In many cases, the attacker launching a ransomware or data theft campaign did not steal the credentials themselves; they simply bought access. At the same time, around three quarters of organisations report that credential leak risk is increasing, reinforcing why identity has become such a lucrative attack surface.

IAB is lowering the barriers for cyber crime massively. In the past, attackers often operated in isolated settings and had to rely on brute-force methods to gain access to networks. Today, they can simply buy their way in and scale their operations more easily. With the technical element of the attack outsourced, lower-skill attackers can focus their efforts on social engineering and deepfake fraud, further refining the human element of their attack. Identity-based attacks also short-circuit the traditional cyber kill chain. Instead of moving step by step through reconnaissance, exploitation and lateral movement, attackers can log in directly using a legitimate identity. At that point, the activity may look indistinguishable from normal user behaviour unless the right controls are in place.

Even low-privilege accounts can provide a foothold. Once inside, attackers can probe for misconfigurations, exploit privilege creep and move laterally towards more sensitive systems. This makes identity governance and access hygiene just as important as perimeter defences.

For organisations, the goal is not only to keep attackers outside the perimeter but also to contain their reach if they do slip through technical barriers. Once an attacker has logged in, they have already bypassed the first layer of defence. However, zero trust and least-privilege access limit the radius of their attack and create additional internal barriers. Without these frameworks in place, organisations are leaving the door wide open for attackers.

Resilience depends on how quickly organisations can spot suspicious network activity, such as impossible logins, mass downloads, and authorised data transfers. Technical tools must lock compromised credentials instantly and be supported by internal governance that provides clear paths for reset and escalation. Given that the average breach takes 241 days to identify and contain, and 76% of organisations take more than 100 days to fully recover, having the right cybersecurity strategy is no longer optional – it is vital for business continuity.

As identity-based attacks surge, organisations are right to enforce security controls for high-value users such as administrators, IT teams, finance leaders and C-suite executives. However, focusing on VIP users first and foremost creates a significant blind spot. This 'VIP-first' approach is a tactic attackers rely on because when security attention is concentrated at the top, it diverts focus away from other users within the organisation.

From an attacker's perspective, any identity is a win. For example, a temporary worker's account may have limited access to data, but if that account lacks MFA or relies on a shared password while the organisation focuses primarily on VIP users, it becomes a prime target.

Topic

Related Insights